<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rel Canonical Link Tag Element Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/</link>
	<description>by Matthew Diehl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=908#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I did a post a couple of weeks ago on how to easily implement cross domain canonical link tags with PHP here: http://www.tylernichols.com/seo/dynamic-url-canonicalization

It&#039;s nice to be able use this method when 301&#039;s are not possible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I did a post a couple of weeks ago on how to easily implement cross domain canonical link tags with PHP here: <a href="http://www.tylernichols.com/seo/dynamic-url-canonicalization" rel="nofollow">http://www.tylernichols.com/seo/dynamic-url-canonicalization</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to be able use this method when 301&#8242;s are not possible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewdiehl</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewdiehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=908#comment-389</guid>
		<description>@Bill - Agreed. Comparing Bing&#039;s indexing speed to Google&#039;s is like comparing the tortoise to the hare (except the moral will not work out in Bing&#039;s favor this time).  I will give Bing some more time to get caught up. Then I will update the post if/when they pick up on the rel canonical link tags.

@Andy - Not really sure who is using Bing... but we have to be cognitive of what is going on there b/c of the major powered by Bing in Yahoo results coming at year end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill &#8211; Agreed. Comparing Bing&#8217;s indexing speed to Google&#8217;s is like comparing the tortoise to the hare (except the moral will not work out in Bing&#8217;s favor this time).  I will give Bing some more time to get caught up. Then I will update the post if/when they pick up on the rel canonical link tags.</p>
<p>@Andy &#8211; Not really sure who is using Bing&#8230; but we have to be cognitive of what is going on there b/c of the major powered by Bing in Yahoo results coming at year end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy @ FirstFound</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy @ FirstFound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=908#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Why do people use Bing? It&#039;s just another indication that they don&#039;t really know what they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people use Bing? It&#8217;s just another indication that they don&#8217;t really know what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/rel-canonical-link-tag-element-update/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=908#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Interesting result Matthew, particularly with Yahoo which compares with their apparent inability to handle 301s. I often see pages appearing in their index which have been 301&#039;nd for months and sometimes years.

I suspect Bing is just slow at spidering - their index took far longer than expected to mature after they took over from MSN/Live and changes seem to take ages to appear. Geo-location also seems to be a problem for them.

Haven&#039;t been a big fan of the canonical tag as I prefer to fix things structurally when possible, but good to know that Google seems to be making good use of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting result Matthew, particularly with Yahoo which compares with their apparent inability to handle 301s. I often see pages appearing in their index which have been 301&#8242;nd for months and sometimes years.</p>
<p>I suspect Bing is just slow at spidering &#8211; their index took far longer than expected to mature after they took over from MSN/Live and changes seem to take ages to appear. Geo-location also seems to be a problem for them.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t been a big fan of the canonical tag as I prefer to fix things structurally when possible, but good to know that Google seems to be making good use of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

