<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Always Get Second Opinions on Search Engine Marketing Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/sem/search-engine-marketing-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/sem/search-engine-marketing-proposals/</link>
	<description>by Matthew S. Diehl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard DeCunha</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/sem/search-engine-marketing-proposals/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard DeCunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=294#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Good points though I think it applies to any proposal. I think getting 3 proposals is something of a 

I would not show a proposal from one vendor to another vendor for two reasons:

a) I think it&#039;s unethical to do this because any proposal contains confidential information that no vendor would like their competition to see

b) The other vendor (s) should present their own proposal (s) based on the information provided to the first vendor. That would be a good way to compare apples to apples. It&#039;s very easy to &quot;improve&quot; on a competitors proposal; it&#039;s harder to stand out from the competition without such privileged info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points though I think it applies to any proposal. I think getting 3 proposals is something of a </p>
<p>I would not show a proposal from one vendor to another vendor for two reasons:</p>
<p>a) I think it&#8217;s unethical to do this because any proposal contains confidential information that no vendor would like their competition to see</p>
<p>b) The other vendor (s) should present their own proposal (s) based on the information provided to the first vendor. That would be a good way to compare apples to apples. It&#8217;s very easy to &#8220;improve&#8221; on a competitors proposal; it&#8217;s harder to stand out from the competition without such privileged info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
