<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Optimization Blog &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com</link>
	<description>by Matthew Diehl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome SERP Enhancement for Author&#8217;s Google Profiles</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/awesome-serp-enhancement-for-authors-google-profiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/awesome-serp-enhancement-for-authors-google-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all have been seeing the smiling faces of our friends in the SERPs for some time when they +1 things and previously when they would tweet things. You know those tiny, tiny smiling faces below the search listing&#8230; can barely make that guy out, thank God there name is right there! Anyways, I am [...]
<strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-new-serp-enhancement-best-guess/' rel='bookmark' title='Google New SERP Enhancement &#8211; &#8220;Best Guess&#8221;'>Google New SERP Enhancement &#8211; &#8220;Best Guess&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-serp-ui-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail'>Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>We all have been seeing the smiling faces of our friends in the SERPs for some time when they +1 things and previously when they would tweet things. You know those tiny, tiny smiling faces below the search listing&#8230; can barely make that guy out, thank God there name is right there!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pluses-enhanced-search.jpg"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pluses-enhanced-search.jpg" alt="" title="pluses-enhanced-search" width="500" height="70" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1716" /></a><br clear="all" /><br />
Anyways, I am seeing something new with larger smiling faces coming back at me and wanted to see if anyone else was getting this?</p>
<p><span id="more-1712"></span></p>
<p>Here are the searches and what I am seeing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=&#038;q=social+media" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/search?hl=&#038;q=social+media</a><br />
<a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/social-media-author-enhancement.jpg"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/social-media-author-enhancement.jpg" alt="" title="social-media-author-enhancement" width="568" height="80" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1713" /></a><br clear="all" /><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=&#038;q=danny+sullivan" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/search?hl=&#038;q=danny+sullivan</a><br />
<a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/danny-sullivan-author-enhancement.jpg"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/danny-sullivan-author-enhancement.jpg" alt="" title="danny-sullivan-author-enhancement" width="566" height="75" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1714" /></a><br clear="all" /></p>
<p>The images and names inside red boxes (added by me) are links to Amy-Mae&#8217;s and Danny&#8217;s Google Plus Profiles. Very interesting&#8230;</p>
<h2>Anyone Else Getting These?</h2>
<p>Let me know in the comments or on Twitter if you are seeing this too.</p>
<h2>Update</h2>
<p>Google has put together a great <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1229920" target="_blank">Authorship help page</a>  for webmasters and bloggers so could potentially start to see your face showing up in the SERPs as the author of your posts. This is not exclusive to just your individual blog but can be enabled on multi-author sites that either host their own author pages or not.  This is good stuff! (technical jargon I know..)</p>
<p><strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-new-serp-enhancement-best-guess/' rel='bookmark' title='Google New SERP Enhancement &#8211; &#8220;Best Guess&#8221;'>Google New SERP Enhancement &#8211; &#8220;Best Guess&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-serp-ui-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail'>Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/awesome-serp-enhancement-for-authors-google-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s New Idiotproof Page Speed Service</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-idiotproof-page-speed-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-idiotproof-page-speed-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very early this morning on Google&#8217;s Code blog they made an announcement of a new service they will begin to offer called Page Speed Service. Google says, &#8220;Page Speed Service is an online service that automatically speeds up loading of your web pages&#8230; Page Speed Service fetches content from your servers, rewrites your pages by [...]
<strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/improve-site-speed-with-better-hosting/' rel='bookmark' title='Improve Site Speed with Better Hosting'>Improve Site Speed with Better Hosting</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/tips-to-increase-site-speed-for-google/' rel='bookmark' title='Tips to Increase Site Speed for Google'>Tips to Increase Site Speed for Google</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/two-google-tools-to-analyze-and-improve-site-speed/' rel='bookmark' title='Two Google Tools to Analyze and Improve Site Speed'>Two Google Tools to Analyze and Improve Site Speed</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/first-page-yahoo-ranking-for-google-notebook-spam/' rel='bookmark' title='First Page Yahoo Ranking for Google Notebook Spam'>First Page Yahoo Ranking for Google Notebook Spam</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Very early this morning on Google&#8217;s Code blog they made an <a href="http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2011/07/page-speed-service-web-performance.html" target="_blank">announcement</a> of a new service they will begin to offer called <a href="http://code.google.com/speed/pss/index.html" target="_blank">Page Speed Service</a>. </p>
<p>Google says, &#8220;Page Speed Service is an online service that automatically speeds up loading of your web pages&#8230; Page Speed Service fetches content from your servers, rewrites your pages by applying web performance best practices, and serves them to end users via Google&#8217;s servers across the globe.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-1693"></span></p>
<p>What Google is really saying here is, &#8220;Most Webmasters and Developers don&#8217;t know how to do their jobs, we get bombarded by these idiots on a daily basis with mundane questions about improving their website&#8217;s load time (<a href="http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/overview.html" target="_blank">even though we have spelled everything out for you</a>). So, we&#8217;ve had enough and just let us f***ing do it for you.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Idiotproofing in 2 Steps</h3>
<p>The thing that website owners are going to love about the service is that it is a two step process.<br />
<a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/idiotproof.jpg"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/idiotproof.jpg" alt="" title="idiotproof" width="150" height="139" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1706" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li>You sign up and provide Google with your serving and reference domains.</li>
<li>You send traffic to Page Speed Service by pointing your DNS CNAME entry to ghs.google.com.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><em>Voilà</em></strong> you are now all set to use the Page Speed Service.</p>
<h3>But, I am already optimized for <em>SPEED</em>?</h3>
<p>So, as a good developer and webmaster you have already been working your ass off to configure your server correctly, minimize code, compress images, etc, etc, etc. Good for you but how good of a job have you done? Google wants to put you to the test at <a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/compare" target="_blank">WebPageTest.org</a>. Here you can compare your current site time against a Google Page Speed Service time [I hear egos popping already]. Mine isn&#8217;t big enough to not run it so I did (DSL/Virginia Config.) and here are the results:</p>
<p>Homepage &#8211; <a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_36_0c9330c85fda217977da67862ab358df/" target="_blank">http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_36_0c9330c85fda217977da67862ab358df/</a><br />
Average Post w/ 1 Image &#8211; <a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_DZ_997b6287963cbedf03aaf3dfdd13aab5/" target="_blank">http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_DZ_997b6287963cbedf03aaf3dfdd13aab5/</a><br />
Post w/ 2 Very Large Images &#8211; <a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_RV_e513ba3b728dbc82698040f5fe8297ef/" target="_blank">http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110728_RV_e513ba3b728dbc82698040f5fe8297ef/</a></p>
<p>So, not a TON of savings on the Homepage. Google was able to trim me down from 3.7 to 3.2 seconds for a first time load but they improved the start to render &#038; repeat visit to less than 2 seconds (which is nice!). Unlike the Homepage both of the other runs had improvements on the start to render for repeat visit and saw improvements across the other metrics as well. </p>
<p>I am currently running the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=1205784&#038;topic=1120718&#038;utm_source=gablog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_campaign=newga-blog&#038;utm_content=sitespeed" target="_blank">Google Analytics Site Speed tracking</a> and I can tell you on average the site loads at about 7 seconds. So, if Google Page Speed Service can get that average to drop to 4 &#8211; 5 seconds that is a nice chunk of time saved.</p>
<h3>In Conclusion</h3>
<p>It simple and idiotproof &#8211; update your DNS and your site loads faster. Done.</p>
<p><strong>Anyone test a site that saw drops from like 10+ seconds down to like 4, 5 or 6? Share the link below (I&#8217;ll approve your comment).</strong></p>
<p><strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/improve-site-speed-with-better-hosting/' rel='bookmark' title='Improve Site Speed with Better Hosting'>Improve Site Speed with Better Hosting</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/tips-to-increase-site-speed-for-google/' rel='bookmark' title='Tips to Increase Site Speed for Google'>Tips to Increase Site Speed for Google</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/two-google-tools-to-analyze-and-improve-site-speed/' rel='bookmark' title='Two Google Tools to Analyze and Improve Site Speed'>Two Google Tools to Analyze and Improve Site Speed</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/first-page-yahoo-ranking-for-google-notebook-spam/' rel='bookmark' title='First Page Yahoo Ranking for Google Notebook Spam'>First Page Yahoo Ranking for Google Notebook Spam</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-idiotproof-page-speed-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circle Me on Google Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/circle-me-on-google-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/circle-me-on-google-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days ago I wrote about the extinction of PR10 sites and specifically talked about the Google downgrade from PR10 to PR9. I said that Google was unable to keep pace with social networking site Facebook because Google does not give websites a reason to link to them. Well, yesterday Google launched Google Plus and [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Two days ago I wrote about the <a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/like-the-dinosaurs-pr10-sites-heading-for-extinction/" target="_blank">extinction of PR10 sites</a> and specifically talked about the Google downgrade from PR10 to PR9. I said that Google was unable to keep pace with social networking site Facebook because Google does not give websites a reason to link to them.</p>
<p>Well, yesterday Google launched <a href="https://plus.google.com/">Google Plus</a> and this is exactly what Google needs to compete with Facebook.</p>
<p><span id="more-1625"></span></p>
<p>Facebook heralded wild success as a person-to-person social networking site but achieved a meteoric rise in recent years because they allowed business, websites, groups and organization to have their own pages allowing them to engage with the people who were fans.</p>
<p>Google Plus is not quite where it needs to be to be able to achieve mass adoption by businesses but they are on their way.</p>
<p>How will they be able to do that?  By reaching outside the Googlesphere of products and sites and achieve presence on everyone else&#8217;s websites the same way that Facebook did, <strong>with badges</strong>.</p>
<p>Go to just about any website and you will see a nice little Facebook icon or Like Us badge telling visitors that they can connect on Facebook with the business, etc. and they will get something in return (discounts, solutions to issues, etc.). </p>
<p><del datetime="2011-07-05T15:51:40+00:00">In a similar fashion, I have already mocked-up a &#8220;Circle Me on Google Plus&#8221; badge (I am not a graphic designer but check it out in my right sidebar).</del>  <strong>UPDATE:</strong> Just found a set of icons for Google Plus that could be used as badges here &#8211; <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/b9gm7x3codas575dxqcc" target="_blank">http://www.box.net/shared/b9gm7x3codas575dxqcc</a>. The badge links off to my Google Plus profile and if you are logged into Google Plus you will see a red button in the upper right corner labeled &#8220;Add to Circles&#8221; that looks like this:<br />
<a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/add-to-circles.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/add-to-circles.gif" alt="Add to Circles - Google Plus" title="add-to-circles" width="100" height="38" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1626" /></a><br clear="all" /></p>
<p>What this does is allows people to create Circles of their favorite products and monitor that stream for information about deals, new products without the interference of your friend&#8217;s new puppy photos and posts about who drank too much last night.</p>
<p>So, as much as Google may want to hang there hats high on the achievement of Google Plus, they should get on these badges ASAP as well as begin to role out profiles that are geared toward businesses to begin the adoption of these badges outside of the SOSG (Seriously Obsessed Search Geek) community. </p>
<p>Also, if anyone much more skilled with design wants to create some Google Plus badges feel free to pimp them in the comments below. I know I could use one that looks awesome!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/circle-me-on-google-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like the Dinosaurs, PR10 Sites Heading for Extinction</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/like-the-dinosaurs-pr10-sites-heading-for-extinction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/like-the-dinosaurs-pr10-sites-heading-for-extinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest PageRank update all I could envision is Google Engineers running around saying, [bonk] &#8220;Not the PR10 site!&#8221; [bonk] &#8220;Not the PR10 site!&#8221;&#8230; What was already an exceptionally limited group of sites holding the distinction of PR10, the badge has now been stripped from a number of the most authoritative sites on the [...]
<strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/circle-me-on-google-plus/' rel='bookmark' title='Circle Me on Google Plus'>Circle Me on Google Plus</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5oT1wqTEOw" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dinosaurs.jpg" alt="" title="dinosaurs" width="360" height="312" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1605" border="0" /></a><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
In the latest PageRank update all I could envision is Google Engineers running around saying, [bonk] &#8220;Not the PR10 site!&#8221; [bonk] &#8220;Not the PR10 site!&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>What was already an exceptionally limited group of sites holding the distinction of PR10, the badge has now been stripped from a number of the most authoritative sites on the Web. Search Engine Genie had a <a href="http://www.searchenginegenie.com/pagerank-10-sites.htm" target="_blank">recent list of PR10 sites</a>, that dates back to January 2011, that I clicked through to see whom of the creme-de-la-creme was still on top. Only 8 of the sites listed still maintained there PR10 status:<span id="more-1603"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" target="_blank">Add This</a></li>
<li><a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/" target="_blank">Adobe Flash Player Download</a></li>
<li><a href="http://get.adobe.com/reader/" target="_blank">Adobe Reader Download</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.eua.be/Home.aspx" target="_blank">European University Association</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.europeana.eu/portal/" target="_blank">Europeana</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/" target="_blank">Facebook</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hhs.gov/" target="_blank">United States Department of Health and Human Services</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.usa.gov/index.shtml" target="_blank">U.S. Government&#8217;s Official Web Portal</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The two most notably dropped were <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> and <a href="http://www.cnn.com" target="_blank">CNN</a> and the two that maintained their PR10 status which attracted my attention are Facebook and AddThis.</p>
<h3>The Google Downgrade and How Facebook Forges On</h3>
<p>As the link graph of the entire web grows the link graph of your website needs to grow with it. Remaining stagnant or only marginally growing is not <a href="http://www.collegebound.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Charlie-Sheen-Winning-Poster.jpg" target="_blank">winning</a> according to the PageRank algorithm. </p>
<p>More and more sites are coming online every minute of every day and with these sites there are more and more links being added to the Web. When a site is redesigned, edited or launched the most common outbound links added are social links. These links are one of two things, profile links to Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter and YouTube or social sharing links through services like AddThis. No one goes, &#8220;Oh we HAVE TO link to Google for our users and customers&#8221; because there is in no benefit to linking to Google for them. However, everyone says &#8220;We have to have a Facebook profile and link to it so we can engage with our customers&#8221;, that is how Facebook maintains their PR10 status.</p>
<p>Google has no one to blame except themselves for being downgraded from PR10 to PR9. Google has just been unable to keep up with the rapid growth that Facebook achieved with garnering links from, well, just about every website on the Web. A clear dominating force in the Social Web Era, Facebook is leading the pack and Google is struggling to even keep pace (from miles behind) but not for a lack of trying. Google is the king of launch and fail but all of this &#8220;spinning of the wheels&#8221; is getting them no where to remain competitive. </p>
<p>The direction that Google is heading, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them drop to a PR8. [gasp]</p>
<p><strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/circle-me-on-google-plus/' rel='bookmark' title='Circle Me on Google Plus'>Circle Me on Google Plus</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/like-the-dinosaurs-pr10-sites-heading-for-extinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chromebook Private Sale at Gilt Groupe</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-chromebook-private-sale-at-gilt-groupe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-chromebook-private-sale-at-gilt-groupe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You remember how everyone went crazy for the Google Chromebook last year. People waited and waited for a beta model to test, some got one and some didn&#8217;t. Well, now you can buy a Chromebook before they go on sale June 15th at the Gilt Groupe. I just received this email invitation from The Chrome [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You remember how everyone went crazy for the Google Chromebook last year. People waited and waited for a beta model to test, some got one and some didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Well, now you can buy a Chromebook before they go on sale June 15th at the Gilt Groupe. I just received this email invitation from The Chrome Team at Google:</p>
<p><span id="more-1583"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-chromebook-on-sale.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-chromebook-on-sale.gif" alt="Google Chromebook On Sale at Gilt Groupe" title="google-chromebook-on-sale" width="590" height="622" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1594" /></a></p>
<p>Looks like a limited supply of Chromebooks have been pre-allocated to Gilt Groupe for sale.</p>
<p>Here is the Gilt Groupe sale page:<br />
<a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gilt-groupe-chromebook-sale.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gilt-groupe-chromebook-sale-sm.gif" alt="Gilt Groupe Chromebook Sale Page" title="gilt-groupe-chromebook-sale-sm" width="590" height="544" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1596" /></a></p>
<p>Here is what the details of the sale are:<br />
With your Chromebook order from Gilt, you&#8217;ll also receive a limited-edition Chromebook sleeve designed by Rickshaw. Sleeve will be shipped separately.</p>
<p>• 12.1&#8243; (1280&#215;800) Display<br />
• 3.26 lbs / 1.48 kg<br />
• Up to 8.5 hours of continuous usage*<br />
• Intel Dual-Core Processor<br />
• Built in dual-band Wi-Fi and World-mode 3G**<br />
• HD Webcam<br />
• 2 USB 2.0 ports<br />
• 4-in-1 memory card slot<br />
• Mini-VGA port<br />
• Fullsize Chrome keyboard<br />
• Oversized, fully-clickable trackpad</p>
<p>*Engineering specs can change without prior notice. Battery times are estimates, depend on lots of different factors, and may decline over time.</p>
<p>**All Chromebook Series 5 3G models include up to 100MB per month of Mobile Broadband service included with device for 2 years, provided by Verizon. Also available are an unlimited day pass for just $9.99 and pay-as-you-go rates that don&#8217;t require any long-term contracts.</p>
<p>Brand: Samsung</p>
<p>Color: arctic white</p>
<p>Now, who is dropping $499 for a Chromebook?</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-chromebook-private-sale-at-gilt-groupe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google New SERP Enhancement &#8211; &#8220;Best Guess&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-new-serp-enhancement-best-guess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-new-serp-enhancement-best-guess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s primary goal is to deliver search users the best possible answers to any query. Often times this requires them to include enhanced features like maps, video, images, news, etc. Now, lets add &#8220;Best Guess&#8221; to the list of enhancements. The SERPs are in fact Google&#8217;s best guesses to answer the query that you have [...]
<strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/awesome-serp-enhancement-for-authors-google-profiles/' rel='bookmark' title='Awesome SERP Enhancement for Author&#8217;s Google Profiles'>Awesome SERP Enhancement for Author&#8217;s Google Profiles</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-serp-ui-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail'>Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Google&#8217;s primary goal is to deliver search users the best possible answers to any query. Often times this requires them to include enhanced features like maps, video, images, news, etc. Now, lets add &#8220;Best Guess&#8221; to the list of enhancements.</p>
<p>The SERPs are in fact Google&#8217;s best guesses to answer the query that you have entered and now, included in those results is Google&#8217;s singular best guess. Here is what it looks like:</p>
<p><span id="more-1554"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/google-best-guess.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/google-best-guess.gif" alt="Google Best Guess Enhanced SERP" title="google-best-guess" width="590" height="113" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1558" /></a></p>
<p>Clean, simple, and nothing fancy about it, just the answer that Google thinks is the best guess answer to your query based on their sources. So, lets <strong>check out those sources</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/best-guess-show-sources.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/best-guess-show-sources.gif" alt="Google Best Guess Show Sources" title="best-guess-show-sources" width="590" height="192" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1559" /></a></p>
<p>3 sources from Wikipedia<br />
3 sources from NYTimes.com<br />
1 source from WordPress.com</p>
<p>All 7 of these sources are pulled from the first page of results. It&#8217;s obvious why Wikipedia is there (they are <em>always</em> there), the same goes for NYTimes.com as it is a brand related search but what is that WordPress resource? Turns out, it is a Liverpool FC fan site that happened to blog about the LFC now being part owned by NYT. Not your most trusted resource to list but none-the-less a resource that had it right.</p>
<p>It looks like Google Best Guess is designed to mine the sources on the first page of results and when enough sources, looks to be 7 is the magic number, &#8220;say the same thing&#8221; Google will generate their best guess to save the user the time of clicking on each site.</p>
<p>So while trying to find more examples for everyone I found that Google Best Guess consistant shows up on <strong>Celebrity marriage queries like &#8220;so-and-so is married to&#8221; or &#8220;who is married to so-and-so&#8221;</strong>. Well, Best Guess needs a little more work&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ashton-kutcher-spouse.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ashton-kutcher-spouse.gif" alt="Ashton Kutcher is married to" title="ashton-kutcher-spouse" width="590" height="44" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1564" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/demi-moore-spouse.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/demi-moore-spouse.gif" alt="Demi Moore is married to" title="demi-moore-spouse" width="590" height="42" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1565" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bruce-willis-spouse1.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bruce-willis-spouse1.gif" alt="Bruce Willis is married to" title="bruce-willis-spouse" width="590" height="47" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1567" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/emma-hemming-spouse.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/emma-hemming-spouse.gif" alt="Emma Hemming is married to" title="emma-hemming-spouse" width="590" height="41" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1568" /></a></p>
<p>Looks like Bruce and Ashton are still duking it out over Demi, sorry Emma. But the good news is, there is a feedback button next to the Best Guess result and you can let Google know when they got it right or wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bruce-willis-accurate.gif"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bruce-willis-accurate.gif" alt="Bruce Willis married to wrong" title="bruce-willis-accurate" width="560" height="34" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1571" /></a></p>
<p>Anyone else seeing the Google Best Guess results and have example queries they want to share?</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE &#8211; Other types of searches that generate a Best Guess</strong><br />
Author &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&#038;sugexp=ldymls&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=who+wrote+harry+potter&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who wrote harry potter</a>&#8221; or &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=who+is+the+author+of+white+fang&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the author of white fang</a>&#8221;<br />
CEO &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&#038;sugexp=ldymls&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=who%20is%20the%20CEO%20of%20apple&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the CEO of apple</a>&#8221; (courtesy of <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NoScoJoJo" target="_blank">Joanne B.</a> but not for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&#038;sugexp=ldymls&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=who%20is%20the%20CEO%20of%20microsoft&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the ceo of microsoft</a>&#8221; (too much Balmer/Gates confusion on 1st page)<br />
World Leaders &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=who+is+the+president+of+the+usa&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the president of the usa</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&#038;sugexp=ldymls&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=who+is+the+canadian+prime+minister&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the canadian priminister</a>&#8221; but not &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=who%20is%20the%20prime%20minister%20of%20canada&#038;fp=d7e9db0d83390719" target="_blank">who is the prime minister of canada</a>&#8221; (courtesy of Joanne B. as well)</p>
<p><strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/awesome-serp-enhancement-for-authors-google-profiles/' rel='bookmark' title='Awesome SERP Enhancement for Author&#8217;s Google Profiles'>Awesome SERP Enhancement for Author&#8217;s Google Profiles</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/googles-new-serp-ui-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail'>Google&#8217;s New SERP UI Fail</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/google-new-serp-enhancement-best-guess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google Will Likely Handle +1 Scammers</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/how-google-will-likely-handle-1-scammers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/how-google-will-likely-handle-1-scammers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t heard already, Google has launched a new social feature integrated into the SERPs called +1. (get out from under your rock already! geesh) I am not going to bore you with another &#8220;what is +1&#8243; post because you can already get that here. Rather, I would like to explore thoughts on how [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you haven&#8217;t heard already, Google has launched a new social feature integrated into the SERPs called <a href="http://www.google.com/+1/button/" target="_blank">+1</a>. (get out from under your rock already! <em>geesh</em>)</p>
<p>I am not going to bore you with another &#8220;what is +1&#8243; post because you can already get that <a href="http://searchengineland.com/meet-1-googles-answer-to-the-facebook-like-button-70569" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-1500"></span></p>
<p>Rather, I would like to explore thoughts on how Google will likely handle sites that it identifies as trying to scam the +1 and manipulate votes.</p>
<h3>Monitoring +1</h3>
<p>Google is going to be tracking every +1 cast. By this I mean, they will be tracking where the +1 votes come from at many levels like Google Profile, IP, Geo-location and other unique identifiers. Google will likely process all this data and if they notice patterns, like constant votes from specific unique identifiers, they will take action against those +1s.</p>
<h3>Types of Actions</h3>
<p>Like links, and just because of what it is, +1 will likely be scammed to the dickens. But how will Google combat this?</p>
<h4>Profile Removal</h4>
<p>If Google thinks that your profile is part of a network of profiles created to inflate +1 votes, I would not put it past them to just shut down your profile. </p>
<p>This shutdown may not happen right away because like a good sting operation they will likely be collecting data on that profile as well as many others to large profile removal processes all at once (ala Twitter style back in the day).</p>
<h4>+1 Devaluation</h4>
<p>Google can&#8217;t always determine the root of all scamming practices so they often go with a devaluation approach. As we are told by Google, this is something that they already do for scammy/spammy links. It is likely that they will adapt this technology to be able to sniff out and devalue +1 scammers.</p>
<h4>Bot Captchas</h4>
<p>You know when you are flying through the SERPs, entering query after query rather quickly and Google all of sudden says &#8220;Hey! We think you are some kinda robot, fill out this captcha to prove to us you are not. Thanks!&#8221;. Well, Google could easily take this rapid querying detection tool and again adapt to detect rapid +1 on a given profile or other unique identifier to stop bots.</p>
<h3>The Unlikely</h3>
<p>It is unlikely that Google will actually serve up penalties to the destination sites of the +1 votes and if they do it will be far and few between. They will need some pretty solid evidence that a site owner is the one really behind the manipulate votes. </p>
<h3>A Waste</h3>
<p>Like with link spamming tactics that are easily uncovered by Google, +1 scamming and vote inflation will be just be a waste of time and dollars for anyone who thinks that it will help them to achieve better results in the SERPs. It may take time but Google most always gets their guy.</p>
<h4>What&#8217;d I Miss?</h4>
<p>What do you think? Any other ways in which Google will be able to sniff out and squash the scammers? Leave a comment. </p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/how-google-will-likely-handle-1-scammers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access Link to New Version of Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/access-link-to-new-version-of-google-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/access-link-to-new-version-of-google-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t heard Google is launching a new version of Google Analytics. They are allowing people to sign up for access to the new version by submitting this simple form. I signed up for my access on the March 17th and it is already here. How do you know if you have gotten access [...]
<strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/analytics/bypassing-the-google-analytics-overview-pages/' rel='bookmark' title='Bypassing the Google Analytics Overview Pages'>Bypassing the Google Analytics Overview Pages</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/not-cuil-google-analytics/' rel='bookmark' title='Not &#8220;Cuil&#8221; Google Analytics'>Not &#8220;Cuil&#8221; Google Analytics</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/google-analytics-error-in-ie-and-ff/' rel='bookmark' title='Google Analytics Error in IE and FF but NOT Chrome'>Google Analytics Error in IE and FF but NOT Chrome</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/screenshots-of-updated-google-analytics-standard-segmentations/' rel='bookmark' title='Screenshots of Updated Google Analytics Standard Segmentations'>Screenshots of Updated Google Analytics Standard Segmentations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/analytics/finding-google-secure-search-data-in-web-analytics-platforms/' rel='bookmark' title='How to: Finding Google Secure Search Data in Different Web Analytics Platforms'>How to: Finding Google Secure Search Data in Different Web Analytics Platforms</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you haven&#8217;t heard Google is launching a <a href="http://analytics.blogspot.com/search/label/New%20Google%20Analytics" target="_blank">new version of Google Analytics</a>. They are allowing people to sign up for access to the new version by submitting this <a href="https://services.google.com/fb/forms/newanalyticssignup/" target="_blank">simple form</a>.</p>
<p>I signed up for my access on the March 17th and it is already here. How do you know if you have gotten access after signing up? Look for this in your Google Analytics account for the account that you submitted:</p>
<p><span id="more-1478"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/google-analytics-new-version-link.png"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/google-analytics-new-version-link.png" alt="New Version of Google Analytics Access Link" title="google-analytics-new-version-link" width="538" height="82" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1479" /></a></p>
<p>Once you click the link, you will be taken to the new profile listing page. From there click on the profile you want to view and you are in!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/google-analytics-new-dashboard.png"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/google-analytics-new-dashboard.png" alt="New Dashboard in Google Anaytics" title="google-analytics-new-dashboard" width="377" height="341" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1480" /></a></p>
<p>Time to learn a new UI! </p>
<p><strong>Related posts:<strong><ul>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/analytics/bypassing-the-google-analytics-overview-pages/' rel='bookmark' title='Bypassing the Google Analytics Overview Pages'>Bypassing the Google Analytics Overview Pages</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/not-cuil-google-analytics/' rel='bookmark' title='Not &#8220;Cuil&#8221; Google Analytics'>Not &#8220;Cuil&#8221; Google Analytics</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/google-analytics-error-in-ie-and-ff/' rel='bookmark' title='Google Analytics Error in IE and FF but NOT Chrome'>Google Analytics Error in IE and FF but NOT Chrome</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/screenshots-of-updated-google-analytics-standard-segmentations/' rel='bookmark' title='Screenshots of Updated Google Analytics Standard Segmentations'>Screenshots of Updated Google Analytics Standard Segmentations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/analytics/finding-google-secure-search-data-in-web-analytics-platforms/' rel='bookmark' title='How to: Finding Google Secure Search Data in Different Web Analytics Platforms'>How to: Finding Google Secure Search Data in Different Web Analytics Platforms</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/access-link-to-new-version-of-google-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Googlebot can&#8217;t afford Enzyte</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/googlebot-cant-afford-enzyte/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/googlebot-cant-afford-enzyte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, lets get the obvious puns out of the way: Googlebot needs some natural spider enhancement, Googlebot needs a bigger band-width for your site, Googlebot needs to last longer crawling your site. Those are pretty bad&#8230;. but, if you came here for the pen15 jokes, thanks! Now, move on, perv. What I am going to [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Alright, lets get the obvious puns out of the way: Googlebot needs some <em>natural spider enhancement</em>, Googlebot needs a bigger band-<em>width</em> for your site, Googlebot needs to <em>last longer</em> crawling your site.  Those are pretty bad&#8230;. but, if you came here for the pen15 jokes, thanks! Now, move on, perv.</p>
<p>What I am going to actually talk about is site architecture and how you might be wasting Googlebot&#8217;s crawling bandwidth for your site.<span id="more-1462"></span></p>
<h3>Site Architecture for SEO</h3>
<p>How your site is structured is very important to SEO on many, many levels. For example, a proper site architecture allows SEOs to target keyphrases properly, develop authoratitive pages and appease the mighty search spiders.</p>
<p>An ad-hoc site architecture can be difficult to work worth and even more difficult to achieve the results that many sites are looking for out of their SEO campaigns. So, before you jump into your site &#8211; <strong>plan ahead</strong>.</p>
<p>Lets say your are completely re-doing your site. What you want to do is during the wire framing phase of your site&#8217;s build out think SEO or  bring an SEO into the discussion so you know you have your major keyphrase targets covered. This will make the optimization go smoothly down the road. Also, an SEO will be able to make suggestions as to what is missing so you accommodate expansions now or make the site flexible enough to accommodate this new content later.</p>
<h3>Evaluate Your Platform</h3>
<p>Take the time to really test out the platform you are considering on using for your site. Focus in on how the platform builds the URLs as you click around. What you are keeping an eye out for is URL-bloat through improper canonicalization of URLs or a general issue with how the platform actually works. This is a major consideration for larger e-commerce and news sites because you never want to see the &#8220;Googlebot found an extremely high number of URLs&#8221; error.</p>
<h3>Googlebot Found an Extremely High Number of URLs</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/googlebot-extremely-high-number-urls.png"><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/googlebot-extremely-high-number-urls.png" alt="Googlebot High Number of URLs Error" title="googlebot-extremely-high-number-urls" width="622" height="212" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1464" border="1" /></a></p>
<p>The above error message means you have a serious issue on your hands. If Googlebot is having an issue with the number of URLs your site is offering up for crawling you can bet that Bingbot and every other bot on the planet is probably having the same problem. </p>
<h3>Your Whole Site isn&#8217;t being Crawled</h3>
<p>The error basically tells you Google has used too much bandwidth crawling your site and they aren&#8217;t going to waste any more. This boils down to repetitive URLs displaying the same content (a canonicalization issue). Large sites that have tons of pages but each page has unique content won&#8217;t run into this error, but it&#8217;s large sites that have a dysfunctional CMS that will always get this message.</p>
<h3>See Step 2</h3>
<p>You may have missed something while evaluating your platform, so circle back on how your CMS is building your URLs. Googlebot has clearly found itself in an area of the site that is continuously spitting out URL after URL that aren&#8217;t necessary.</p>
<p>Google even offers up a bit of advice on this too: <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76401" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76401</a></p>
<h5>Googlebot can&#8217;t afford Enzyte</h5>
<p>Google is crawling the entire Internet. Everything! They just can&#8217;t afford to spend forever crawling your defunct site in hopes that eventually they will find the content they were meant to find. Having a proper architecture and platform that respects that architecture will help to keep you out of trouble.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/seo/googlebot-cant-afford-enzyte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Incredible Google</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/the-incredible-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/the-incredible-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Diehl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/?p=1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#60;Announcer&#8217;s Voice&#62; Google: search engine; advertising giant. Searching for a way to tap into the hidden strengths that all their search results have. Then an overdose of webspam fighting radiation alters their organizational chemistry. And now when Google grow angry or outraged, a startling shift in the SERPs occurs. The Google Creature is driven by [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/google-hulk-logo.jpg" alt="the incredible google logo" title="google-hulk-logo" width="295" height="124" /><br />
<br />
&lt;<em>Announcer&#8217;s Voice</em>&gt;<br />
Google: search engine; advertising giant. Searching for a way to tap into the hidden strengths that all their search results have. Then an overdose of webspam fighting radiation alters their organizational chemistry. And now when Google grow angry or outraged, a startling shift in the SERPs occurs. The Google Creature is driven by deceptive SEO and pursued by any whistle blowing investigative reporter. [Google:] &#8220;SEOs, don&#8217;t make me angry. You wouldn&#8217;t like me when I&#8217;m angry.&#8221; The Google Creature is wanted for penalties that it delivers. The Google SERPs were believed to be dead, and Google let the world think they were, until the Webspam Team can find a way to rid them of the spam that dwells within them.<br />
&lt;<em>/Announcer&#8217;s Voice</em>&gt;</p>
<p>For those of you who aren&#8217;t getting the reference, read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredible_Hulk_(TV_series)#Opening_narration" target="_blank">The Incredible Hulk opening narration</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-1372"></span></p>
<h2>The Google Creature Evolves</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/google-creature.jpg" alt="the google creature transformation" title="google-creature" width="500" height="200"/></p>
<p>We were warned that Google would be kicking spam fighting up a notch in 2011. However, no one really guessed that they would be taking it from soft plush toy level to monstrous beast eating big brands for breakfast, lunch and dinner! Not to mention in such a short period of time. Which would you rather have on the case plush toy or monster?</p>
<h3>Not a Plushy SEO World Anymore</h3>
<p>In recent years, SEOs have basically gotten away with murdah. </p>
<p>As Google was committed to growing it&#8217;s product lines and bottom line, they were relatively soft on spam in the SERPs. This was an opportunity for SEOs (large and small, in-house and agency) to take a little bit a leeway with some of the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=35769" target="_blank">Google Guidelines</a>. It also allowed entire businesses to grow out of exceedingly low quality content farming because they can make a buck off of traffic from Google. </p>
<p>But, clearly, this is not the case anymore. Google has lined up big brand after big brand over the past couple weeks and slapped them with penalties or the threats of penalties. The ones I am talking about are <strong>JcPenney, Forbes and Overstock</strong>. Also, Google has launched algorithmic updates that take a stand against content farms by elevating ability to better detect source attribution.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Information on the first algorithm change in <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/algorithm-change-launched/" target="_blank">January</a> and now another in <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-forecloses-on-content-farms-with-farmer-algorithm-update-66071" target="_blank">February</a> that combined impacts close to 14% of all the searches conducted on Google and specifically aimed at improving SERPs based on content quality of sites.</p>
<p>Against the plushy spam fighting, SEOs were able to take some more chances with link building and other tactics that are in the black and grey areas because they were working and there were no immediate repercussions.</p>
<p>Under reinvigorated Webspam monster, these brash tactics are going to get you in trouble. The SEOs that think they have found a &#8220;loophole&#8221; for their client or organization to manipulate the results are going to quickly learn that it is not the direction for long term success (for the client or your career).</p>
<h3>Taming the Beast</h3>
<p>Stick to SEO techniques that fall within the guidelines. There is no loophole that will ever go completely undetected by Google, your bad SEO foot prints will be found and you will pay big time in the SERPs. By playing by the rules that Google has set up you will completely avoid having to tangle with the Webspam Team&#8217;s monster.</p>
<p>These are my <a href="http://www.google.com/images?q=white+hat&#038;um=1&#038;hl=en&#038;safe=active&#038;biw=1583&#038;bih=862&#038;tbs=isch:1,ic:specific,isc:white&#038;source=lnt&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=7ctmTZnoH4P88AbbkPmVCw&#038;ved=0CB8QpwU" target="_blank">hats</a> and wearing them I have only had success.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matthewsdiehl.com/google/the-incredible-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

